Follow Us:

LABELLING

Home QC LABELLING

MDR TDF QC Check: Information Supplied with the Device

Internal · QC Department

Review the labelling and IFU section of the MDR technical file against Annex I, Chapter III (GSPR 23) and the applicable references. Mark each check OK, Issue or N/A. Issues are collected into a report that is emailed to the QC reviewer, consultant and team lead.

1. Project

2. Checklist

0/0 reviewed · 0 issues

Set sterile supply, implantable, IFU format and target user above to show only the relevant sections.

Common NB findings: check these first

0/7
  1. N1

    IFU carries the serious-incident reporting notice (to the manufacturer and the Competent Authority) verbatim, without softened wording

    Common NB finding · GSPR 23.4(z) · Art. 87 · see F9 · Evidence: IFU regulatory notice section

  2. N2

    Intended purpose, indications, target population and contraindications on label / IFU match the CER and risk file word for word

    Common NB finding · GSPR 23.4(b) · ISO 14971 · MDCG 2020-6 · see F1, I2 · Evidence: IFU section 1 vs CER vs risk management file

  3. N3

    UDI carrier present in both AIDC (2D DataMatrix / linear barcode) and HRI form, with verified print grade ≥ 1.5 (C)

    Common NB finding · Art. 27 · Annex VI Part C · ISO/IEC 15415 / 15416 · see A4 · Evidence: UDI master plan + barcode verification report

  4. N4

    Reusable devices: maximum number of reuses, inspection / end-of-life criteria and validated reprocessing parameters stated in the IFU

    Common NB finding · GSPR 23.4(n) · ISO 17664 / AAMI TIR12 · see F5 · Evidence: IFU reprocessing section + cleaning validation report

  5. N5

    eIFU used only with Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 fulfilled: documented risk assessment, paper copy within 7 calendar days, access details on label

    Common NB finding · GSPR 23.1(f) · Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 · see G1–G3 · Evidence: eIFU justification dossier + website SOP

  6. N6

    CMR 1A/1B or endocrine-disrupting substances > 0.1% w/w (e.g. DEHP, DBP) labelled on device / packaging and explained in the IFU

    Common NB finding · GSPR 10.4.5 · 23.2(f) · 23.4(s) · see D8 · Evidence: Material characterisation report (ISO 10993-18)

  7. N7

    Every symbol not taken from EN ISO 15223-1 is fully explained in the IFU or accompanying documentation

    Common NB finding · GSPR 23.1(h) · EN ISO 15223-1 · see C3 · Evidence: IFU symbol glossary vs master artwork

A. Regulatory basis and applicable references

0/6
  1. A1

    Regulatory route confirmed: device is under MDR 2017/745 (IVDs need a separate IVDR checklist, Annex I §20); class and rule recorded

    Art. 51; Annex VIII · MDCG 2021-24 · Evidence: Classification rationale + regulatory strategy

  2. A2

    Applicability of Annex I §23.1, 23.2, 23.3 and 23.4 mapped clause by clause, with a rationale for every N/A clause

    Annex I §23 · Annex II §4 · Evidence: Labelling traceability matrix / GSPR checklist

  3. A3

    TD contains the complete set of labels and IFUs: all packaging levels and all languages for the intended markets

    Annex II §2 · Evidence: TD labelling section + artwork index

  4. A4

    Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI assigned and UDI carrier requirements applied to every packaging level

    Art. 27 · Annex VI Part C · Evidence: UDI assignment record + packaging hierarchy

  5. A5

    Device and manufacturer data on the label (name, SRN, address, Basic UDI-DI) match the EUDAMED registration

    Art. 29 · Annex VI Part A · Evidence: EUDAMED registration printout vs label

  6. A6

    CE marking applied per Art. 20 and Annex V, with NB number where required, consistent with the DoC

    Art. 20 · Annex V · Evidence: Label artwork + EU Declaration of Conformity

B. Harmonised standards and guidance

0/7
  1. B1

    Standards list identifies each labelling standard with edition and EU harmonisation status; approach to standards follows MDCG 2021-5

    Art. 8 · MDCG 2021-5 Rev. 1 · Evidence: Standards list / gap assessment

  2. B2

    EN ISO 15223-1:2021 + A1:2025 applied for symbols; current harmonised listing and transition arrangements checked

    EN ISO 15223-1 · Evidence: Symbol alignment matrix + OJEU listing check

  3. B3

    ISO 20417 edition confirmed (ISO 20417:2026 published March 2026); presumption of conformity claimed only for a harmonised EN edition

    ISO 20417 · Evidence: Standards list + harmonisation status check

  4. B4

    EN ISO 14971 used to cross-check warnings, precautions, residual risks and user information

    EN ISO 14971 · Evidence: Risk management file vs IFU

  5. B5

    EN ISO 11607-1 / -2 applied to sterile barrier system labelling and packaging validation

    EN ISO 11607-1 / -2 · Evidence: Packaging validation file

  6. B6

    Sterilisation standard matches the declared method (EN ISO 11135 EO, EN ISO 11137 radiation, EN ISO 17665 moist heat)

    EN ISO 11135 / 11137 / 17665 · Evidence: Sterilisation validation report vs label symbol

  7. B7

    Product- or technology-specific standards applied for additional labelling, warnings and symbol requirements (e.g. IEC 60601-1, ISO 80369)

    Device-specific standards · Evidence: Standards list + product-specific marking checks

C. General principles and delivery formats (GSPR 23.1)

0/5
  1. C1

    Required particulars appear on the device itself, or a documented rationale shows direct marking is not practicable or appropriate

    GSPR 23.1(b) · Evidence: Labelling traceability matrix + device drawing

  2. C2

    Lay users: plain wording, legible type size, consult-a-professional circumstances stated, warnings validated in summative usability testing

    GSPR 23.1(a) · 23.4(w) · IEC 62366-1 · Evidence: Usability engineering file + summative report

  3. C3

    All symbols and identification colours conform to EN ISO 15223-1 (proportions, colours) or are described where no standard exists

    GSPR 23.1(h) · Evidence: Artwork spec sheets + ISO 15223-1 alignment matrix

  4. C4

    No IFU supplied (Class I / IIa): rationale shows safe use without instructions; 23.4(p) and (v) information available on request

    GSPR 23.1(d) · Evidence: Risk management file + usability assessment

  5. C5

    Label and IFU translated into the languages required by each target Member State, under a controlled translation procedure

    Art. 10(11) · Evidence: Translation control procedure + language matrix

D. Label (GSPR 23.2)

0/8
  1. D1

    Label shows trade name, model / catalogue number, package contents, intended purpose where not obvious, and the MD symbol

    GSPR 23.2(a), (b), (q) · Evidence: Master label artwork

  2. D2

    Manufacturer legal name and registered address match the QMS / MDR certificate; EC REP name and address shown for non-EU manufacturers

    GSPR 23.2(c), (d) · Evidence: Label drawing vs certificate + EC REP agreement

  3. D3

    CE mark in correct proportions with the valid 4-digit NB number (Class Is, Im, Ir, IIa, IIb, III)

    Art. 20 · Annex V · Evidence: Master label drawing + NB certificate

  4. D4

    Lot or serial number shown with the ISO 15223-1 LOT / SN symbol; implantables carry serial (active) or serial / lot number

    GSPR 23.2(g), (s) · Evidence: Packaging specification + batch record SOP

  5. D5

    Use-by date unambiguous (at least year and month, YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-MM) or date of manufacture where no use-by applies; matches aging data

    GSPR 23.2(i), (j) · Evidence: Real-time and accelerated aging reports

  6. D6

    Storage and handling conditions (temperature, humidity, light) listed and aligned with stability and transit testing

    GSPR 23.2(k) · Evidence: Stability data + ASTM D4169 / ISTA transit report

  7. D7

    Single-use device shows the do-not-reuse symbol and the IFU explains the risks of reuse, based on the risk file

    GSPR 23.2(n) · 23.4(p) · Evidence: Packaging artwork + risk management file

  8. D8

    Label indicates medicinal substances, human or animal tissues / derivatives, and qualitative composition for substance-based devices

    GSPR 23.2(e), (r) · Evidence: Biological safety dossier + composition data

E. Sterile packaging and sterile barrier system (GSPR 23.3)

0/4
  1. E1

    Sterile packaging recognisable as such; single or double sterile barrier symbol per EN ISO 11607-1

    GSPR 23.3(a) · Evidence: Pouch / blister artwork + ISO 11607 file

  2. E2

    Sterile state and method declared on the sterile barrier (STERILE EO, STERILE R, STERILE steam) and on the label

    GSPR 23.2(l) · 23.3(b), (c) · Evidence: Primary packaging drawing + sterilisation validation

  3. E3

    Instruction to check the IFU if the sterile packaging is damaged or unintentionally opened; IFU gives the action to take

    GSPR 23.3(j) · 23.4(l) · Evidence: Label artwork + IFU + risk controls

  4. E4

    Sterile packaging shows manufacturer name and address, device description, month and year of manufacture and use-by date

    GSPR 23.3(d), (e), (h), (i) · Evidence: Primary label artwork + lot record SOP

F. Instructions for use (GSPR 23.4)

0/9
  1. F1

    IFU states intended purpose, indications, contraindications, patient target group, intended users and use environment

    GSPR 23.4(b) · Evidence: IFU section 1 vs CER

  2. F2

    Clinical benefits and performance characteristics match the CER and PMS data; Class III and implantables link to the SSCP in EUDAMED

    GSPR 23.4(c), (d), (e) · Art. 32 · Evidence: CER clinical benefit analysis + SSCP

  3. F3

    Residual risks, undesirable side-effects, warnings and precautions from the ISO 14971 file are fully listed

    GSPR 23.4(g), (s) · Evidence: Residual risk table + IFU warnings section

  4. F4

    Compatible devices, accessories and software / hardware versions, IT network and IT security requirements specified

    GSPR 23.4(f), (q), (ab) · MDCG 2019-16 · Evidence: Cybersecurity file + system specification

  5. F5

    Reusable devices: validated cleaning, disinfection and sterilisation parameters and end-of-life criteria stated

    GSPR 23.4(n), (o) · Evidence: Cleaning and sterilisation validation (ISO 17664)

  6. F6

    Installation check, preventive maintenance, consumables, calibration intervals and routine safety checks described

    GSPR 23.4(k) · Evidence: Service and maintenance manual

  7. F7

    Radiation-emitting devices: nature, type, intensity and distribution of radiation and protection measures stated

    GSPR 23.4(r) · Evidence: IEC 60601-1-3 / IEC 60825 test report

  8. F8

    Safe disposal of device, accessories and consumables: infection, sharps, WEEE and hazardous components covered

    GSPR 23.4(v) · Evidence: Environmental risk assessment + IFU disposal section

  9. F9

    IFU date of issue, or date and identifier of the latest revision, clearly shown

    GSPR 23.4(y) · Evidence: Document history / revision table

G. Electronic IFU (Reg. (EU) 2021/2226)

0/3
  1. G1

    Device and intended users qualify for eIFU under Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 (as amended)

    Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 Art. 3 · GSPR 23.1(f) · Evidence: eIFU eligibility assessment

  2. G2

    Documented eIFU risk assessment covers user access, failure modes and emergency information

    Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 Art. 5 · Evidence: eIFU risk assessment

  3. G3

    Paper IFU supplied free of charge within 7 calendar days on request; label shows eIFU symbol, website and how to request paper

    Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 Art. 5–7 · Evidence: Website SOP + label artwork

H. Implant card and patient information (Art. 18)

0/4
  1. H1

    Art. 18 applicability decided against the exempted device list (Art. 18(3)) and implant card device types

    Art. 18(3) · MDCG 2021-11 · Evidence: Implant card applicability rationale

  2. H2

    Implant card gives device name, type, serial / lot number, UDI, manufacturer name, address and website, with fields for patient, date and centre

    Art. 18(1)(a) · MDCG 2019-8 · Evidence: Implant card artwork + verification check

  3. H3

    Patient information covers expected lifetime, follow-up, warnings and precautions, and qualitative / quantitative material composition

    Art. 18(1)(b)–(d) · GSPR 23.4(u), (aa) · Evidence: Patient information leaflet artwork

  4. H4

    Card and leaflet state MRI status (MR Safe, MR Conditional, MR Unsafe) with verified conditions

    Art. 18(1)(b) · ASTM F2503 · Evidence: MRI evaluation report (ASTM F2503 / ISO 10974)

I. Consistency with TD, risk, clinical and PMS

0/4
  1. I1

    Each warning, precaution and contraindication traces to a risk control or residual risk ID in the risk file

    EN ISO 14971 · Annex II §5 · Evidence: Labelling-to-risk traceability matrix

  2. I2

    Claims and performance characteristics in label / IFU are supported by the CER and V&V data

    Annex II §6 · MDCG 2020-13 · Evidence: CER + V&V summary

  3. I3

    Label and IFU consistent with the DoC, EUDAMED data, SSCP and marketing material

    Art. 19, 32 · Annex IV · Evidence: Cross-document consistency check

  4. I4

    PMS, vigilance and FSCA outputs reviewed for labelling impact; label / IFU changes under change control

    Annex III · Art. 83–86 · Evidence: PMS plan / PSUR + labelling change records

J. Reference control and QC sign-off

0/6
  1. J1

    Legal MDR requirements, harmonised standards, non-binding guidance and internal I3CGLOBAL QC criteria kept separate

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Reference register

  2. J2

    Not every standard or guidance applied to every device: applicability and exclusion rationale recorded

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Reference register / applicability notes

  3. J3

    Controlled reference register shows title, identifier, edition, publication date, applicability, harmonisation status, link and date last checked

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Reference register

  4. J4

    Current harmonised standards list and latest MDCG revisions verified on the Commission website before final approval

    MDCG register · OJEU · Evidence: Dated verification record

  5. J5

    Each deficiency logged with corrective action, owner, target date and close-out sign-off

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Deficiency and corrective action log

  6. J6

    Final review signed by QA reviewer, RA specialist, usability / systems engineer and medical safety / CER author

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Signed QC approval record

3. QC report

Not started

Progress is saved in this browser only.