Follow Us:

IVDR LABELLING

Home QC IVDR LABELLING
Internal · QC Department

IVDR TDF QC Check: Information Supplied with the Device

Review the information supplied with the device (label, packaging and instructions for use) in the technical documentation against Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR), Annex I, Chapter III, Section 20 and the applicable references. Mark each check OK, Issue or N/A. Issues are collected into a report that is emailed to the QC reviewer, consultant and team lead.

1. Project

2. Checklist

0/0 reviewed · 0 issues

Set sterile supply, device type, IFU format and intended user above to show only the relevant sections.

Common NB findings: check these first

0/7
  1. N1

    IFU intended purpose covers every IVDR element: what is detected or measured (analyte / marker), function (screening, diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis, prediction, companion diagnostic), condition, specimen type, testing population, intended user, automated or not, qualitative / semi-quantitative / quantitative

    Common NB finding · Annex I §20.4.1(c) · Annex II §1.1 · see G1 · Evidence: IFU intended purpose vs TD device description and PER

  2. N2

    Analytical and clinical performance claims in the IFU match the performance evaluation report exactly; no claim without supporting data

    Common NB finding · Art. 56 · Annex XIII · see J4–J8 · Evidence: IFU performance section vs PER (scientific validity, APR, CPR)

  3. N3

    Electronic IFU used only for devices intended for professional use, never for self-testing or near-patient testing (Reg. (EU) 2021/2226 is an MDR regulation and does not apply to IVDs)

    Common NB finding · Annex I §20.1(f) · see C5 · Evidence: eIFU rationale vs intended user

  4. N4

    Self-testing / near-patient testing: label and IFU wording validated with representative intended users; result reading and follow-up actions are understood

    Common NB finding · Annex I §19, §20.4.2 · IEC 62366-1 · see M1 · Evidence: Usability / lay-user comprehension study report

  5. N5

    Reagents containing dangerous substances or mixtures carry CLP pictograms, signal words and hazard / precautionary statements; SDS available unless all information is in the IFU

    Common NB finding · Annex I §20.1(i), (j) · Reg. (EC) 1272/2008 · Reg. (EC) 1907/2006 · see D12 · Evidence: CLP classification + SDS vs label artwork

  6. N6

    Metrological traceability of calibrator and trueness-control values stated, with reference materials / reference measurement procedures of higher order

    Common NB finding · Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 17511 · see G4 · Evidence: Traceability report vs IFU

  7. N7

    IFU carries the serious-incident reporting notice (to the manufacturer and the Competent Authority of the Member State where the user and/or patient is established)

    Common NB finding · Annex I §20.4.1 · Art. 82 · see K5 · Evidence: IFU regulatory notice section

A. Regulatory basis and applicable references

0/6
  1. A1

    Device qualifies as an IVD under Art. 2(2); risk class (A, B, C, D) and classification rule recorded with rationale

    Art. 2(2) · Art. 47 · Annex VIII · MDCG 2020-16 · Evidence: Qualification and classification rationale

  2. A2

    Applicability of Annex I §20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4.1 and 20.4.2 mapped clause by clause, with a rationale for every N/A clause

    Annex I §20 · Annex II §4 · Evidence: Labelling traceability matrix / GSPR checklist

  3. A3

    TD contains the complete set of labels and IFUs: outer, inner and primary container labels, all kit components and all languages for the intended markets

    Annex II §2 · Evidence: TD labelling section + artwork index

  4. A4

    Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI assigned; UDI carrier applied on the label and on all higher packaging levels

    Art. 24 · Annex VI Part C · Evidence: UDI assignment record + packaging hierarchy

  5. A5

    Manufacturer and device data on the label (name, SRN, address, Basic UDI-DI) match the EUDAMED registration

    Art. 26–28 · Annex VI Part A · Evidence: EUDAMED registration printout vs label

  6. A6

    CE marking applied per Art. 18 and Annex V, with NB number for Class B, C, D and Class A sterile; consistent with the EU DoC

    Art. 17, 18 · Annex IV, V · Evidence: Label artwork + EU Declaration of Conformity

B. Harmonised standards, common specifications and guidance

0/8
  1. B1

    Standards list identifies each labelling standard with edition and IVDR harmonisation status; approach to standards follows MDCG 2021-5

    Art. 8 · MDCG 2021-5 · Evidence: Standards list / gap assessment

  2. B2

    EN ISO 18113-1 (terms, definitions and general requirements) applied; current edition and harmonisation status checked

    EN ISO 18113-1 · Evidence: Standards list + labelling compliance matrix

  3. B3

    Reagents: EN ISO 18113-2 (professional use) or EN ISO 18113-4 (self-testing) applied as relevant

    EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Evidence: Reagent label and IFU compliance matrix

  4. B4

    Instruments: EN ISO 18113-3 (professional use) or EN ISO 18113-5 (self-testing) applied as relevant

    EN ISO 18113-3 / -5 · Evidence: Instrument label and IFU compliance matrix

  5. B5

    EN ISO 15223-1 applied for symbols, including the IVD symbol; current edition, amendments and harmonised listing checked

    EN ISO 15223-1 · Evidence: Symbol alignment matrix + OJEU listing check

  6. B6

    EN ISO 14971 used to cross-check warnings, precautions, limitations and residual risks

    EN ISO 14971 · Evidence: Risk management file vs IFU

  7. B7

    Instrument / software standards applied for markings and IFU content (e.g. EN IEC 61010-1 and -2-101, EN IEC 61326-2-6, EN 62304, EN IEC 82304-1)

    Device-specific standards · Evidence: Standards list + test reports

  8. B8

    Class D: applicable common specifications (Reg. (EU) 2022/1107) checked for performance and labelling-related requirements

    Art. 9 · Reg. (EU) 2022/1107 · Evidence: CS compliance matrix

C. General requirements (Annex I §20.1)

0/10
  1. C1

    Medium, format, content, legibility and location suit the device, its intended purpose and the intended user's knowledge; drawings / diagrams used where helpful

    Annex I §20.1(a) · Evidence: Label and IFU artwork review

  2. C2

    Required particulars appear on the device itself or, where not practicable (e.g. small vials), on the packaging for each unit (primary / inner) and on the outer packaging

    Annex I §20.1(b) · Evidence: Labelling traceability matrix + packaging hierarchy

  3. C3

    Label is human-readable; machine-readable forms (barcode, RFID) only supplement it

    Annex I §20.1(c) · Evidence: Label artwork

  4. C4

    No IFU / abbreviated IFU only in duly justified, exceptional cases where safe and intended use without an IFU is demonstrated

    Annex I §20.1(d) · Evidence: Justification + risk management file

  5. C5

    IFU supplied in paper by default; electronic IFU only for professional-use devices (not near-patient testing), with label stating how to access it

    Annex I §20.1(f) · §20.2 · Evidence: IFU delivery rationale + label artwork

  6. C6

    Self-testing and near-patient testing devices: IFU supplied in paper (hard copy) with each device

    Annex I §20.1(f) · Evidence: Packaging content list + IFU

  7. C7

    Single IFU copy for multiple devices to one user / location only where agreed with the purchaser; further copies free on request

    Annex I §20.1(e) · Evidence: Distribution SOP / purchaser agreement

  8. C8

    Residual risks to be communicated are included as limitations, contra-indications, precautions or warnings

    Annex I §20.1(g) · Evidence: Residual risk table vs IFU

  9. C9

    Symbols from EN ISO 15223-1 used; any symbol or identification colour not covered by a harmonised standard or CS is described in the documentation supplied

    Annex I §20.1(h) · Evidence: IFU symbol glossary vs master artwork

  10. C10

    Label and IFU in the official Union language(s) required by each target Member State, under a controlled translation procedure

    Art. 10(10) · Evidence: Translation control procedure + language matrix

D. Outer packaging and kit label (Annex I §20.2)

0/16
  1. D1

    Device name / trade name and catalogue, model or reference number; intended purpose where not obvious

    Annex I §20.2(a), (b) · Evidence: Master label artwork

  2. D2

    Legal manufacturer name / registered trade name or trade mark and registered place of business

    Annex I §20.2(c) · Evidence: Label vs certificate / EUDAMED

  3. D3

    EC REP name and address shown for manufacturers based outside the EU

    Annex I §20.2(d) · Evidence: Label + authorised representative mandate

  4. D4

    Clear IVD designation: statement "In vitro diagnostic medical device" or the IVD symbol (EN ISO 15223-1); or, where applicable, device for performance study

    Annex I §20.2(e) · Evidence: Label artwork

  5. D5

    Total kit contents indicated: volume, weight, number of tests or items included

    Annex I §20.2(j) · Evidence: Label artwork vs kit configuration

  6. D6

    Lot number (LOT) or serial number (SN) shown with the ISO 15223-1 symbol

    Annex I §20.2(f) · Evidence: Label artwork + batch record SOP

  7. D7

    UDI carrier present in both AIDC (linear / 2D barcode) and HRI form with verified print quality

    Annex I §20.2(g) · Art. 24 · Annex VI · ISO/IEC 15415 / 15416 · Evidence: UDI plan + barcode verification report

  8. D8

    Use-by date unambiguous (YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-MM) and supported by real-time stability data; date of manufacture where no use-by applies

    Annex I §20.2(h), (i) · EN ISO 23640 · Evidence: Stability report vs label

  9. D9

    Storage and handling conditions (temperature limits, humidity, light, other) shown and aligned with stability and transport studies

    Annex I §20.2(k) · Evidence: Stability + transport study reports

  10. D10

    Sterile status and sterilisation method declared if supplied sterile, or any special microbial state / cleanliness

    Annex I §20.2(l) · Evidence: Label artwork + validation report

  11. D11

    In-use / open-vial stability (after opening, reconstitution, thawing or preparation) shown where different from shelf life, or referenced to the IFU

    Annex I §20.2(k) · EN ISO 18113-2 · Evidence: Label artwork + in-use stability data

  12. D12

    Full CLP alignment for hazardous chemicals, preservatives (e.g. sodium azide) or biological hazards: GHS pictograms, signal word, hazard (H) and precautionary (P) statements (detail in IFU where space is insufficient)

    Annex I §20.1(i) · Reg. (EC) 1272/2008 · Evidence: CLP classification vs label

  13. D13

    Disclosure where reagents contain material of human or animal origin, including infectious agents or biological control sera (biological risk warning)

    Annex I §20.2(m) · §20.4.1 · EN ISO 18113-2 · Evidence: Label artwork + material origin records

  14. D14

    Other warnings / precautions needing the user's immediate attention shown, kept to a minimum with detail in the IFU

    Annex I §20.2(m) · Evidence: Label artwork vs risk file

  15. D15

    Self-testing or near-patient testing use stated explicitly on the label

    Annex I §20.2 · Evidence: Label artwork

  16. D16

    Single-use indication where applicable; kit components also sold separately are labelled as devices in their own right

    Annex I §20.2 · Evidence: Label artwork + kit component list

E. Primary / small component labels (vials, ampoules, cartridges)

0/5
  1. E1

    Primary container shows component name and volume / quantity

    Annex I §20.1(b) · EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Evidence: Primary label artwork

  2. E2

    Primary container shows lot (LOT) or serial (SN) number

    Annex I §20.2(f) · EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Evidence: Primary label artwork

  3. E3

    Primary container shows an unambiguous use-by date

    Annex I §20.2(h) · EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Evidence: Primary label artwork

  4. E4

    Primary container shows storage conditions (or symbol)

    Annex I §20.2(k) · EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Evidence: Primary label artwork

  5. E5

    Component identity clear: reagent / active ingredient, buffer, calibrator or control material (with level where relevant); hazard information where required

    EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Reg. (EC) 1272/2008 · Evidence: Primary label artwork vs kit composition

F. Sterile packaging (Annex I §20.3)

0/4
  1. F1

    Sterile packaging identified as such, with a declaration of sterile condition and the sterilisation method

    Annex I §20.3 · Evidence: Primary packaging artwork + sterilisation validation

  2. F2

    Sterile packaging shows manufacturer name and address, device description, month and year of manufacture and use-by date

    Annex I §20.3 · Evidence: Primary label artwork

  3. F3

    Instruction to check the IFU if the sterile packaging is damaged or unintentionally opened; IFU gives the action to take

    Annex I §20.3 · §20.4.1 · Evidence: Label artwork + IFU

  4. F4

    Sterile barrier system and sterilisation method consistent with validation (EN ISO 11607-1/-2, EN ISO 11135 / 11137)

    EN ISO 11607 · EN ISO 11135 / 11137 · Evidence: Packaging and sterilisation validation reports

G. IFU: identification, intended purpose and test principle

0/4
  1. G1

    Intended purpose stated in full: analyte / marker / parameter, qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative, clinical indication and function (screening, confirmatory, monitoring, diagnosis, CDx), patient population and intended user (laboratory professional, trained healthcare worker or lay person)

    Annex I §20.4.1(c) · Evidence: IFU vs TD Annex II §1.1 and PER

  2. G2

    Companion diagnostics: INN of the associated medicinal product stated

    Annex I §20.4.1(c) · Art. 48 · Evidence: IFU + medicinal product SmPC reference

  3. G3

    Test principle described: scientific principle, reaction or detection method (e.g. PCR, ELISA, lateral flow)

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU text

  4. G4

    Metrological traceability of calibrator and control values to reference materials / higher-order reference measurement procedures

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 17511 · Evidence: Traceability report

H. IFU: reagents, materials and specimens

0/5
  1. H1

    Reagent composition: nature and quantity, proportion or concentration of active ingredients, with buffers and other components

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 18113-2 / -4 · Evidence: Kit composition / formulation record vs IFU

  2. H2

    Materials provided vs materials required but not provided (ancillary equipment, reagents, consumables) listed completely

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU vs kit configuration

  3. H3

    Preparation and storage: reconstitution, thawing, mixing, dilution; validated in-use and working-solution stability stated (e.g. stable 30 days at 2–8 °C after opening)

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 23640 · Evidence: In-use stability reports vs IFU

  4. H4

    Specimen type(s) stated (e.g. serum, EDTA plasma, nasal swab, capillary whole blood)

    Annex I §20.4.1(c) · Evidence: IFU vs specimen validation data

  5. H5

    Pre-analytical requirements: patient preparation, collection tube types, anticoagulant compatibility, centrifugation speed / time, transport, storage temperature, specimen stability and allowable freeze–thaw cycles

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Specimen stability study vs IFU

I. IFU: test procedure, calibration and quality control

0/4
  1. I1

    Step-by-step procedure: sample dilution, incubation times / temperatures, washing, read-out window

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU procedure section vs V&V protocols

  2. I2

    Calibration procedure, calibration frequency and zero / blank setting described

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU calibration section

  3. I3

    Internal and external QC procedures, acceptance criteria and actions when a control fails stated

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU QC section

  4. I4

    Compatible instruments, devices and general-purpose equipment identified, with any known restrictions on combinations

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Compatibility / interoperability data

J. IFU: result interpretation and performance claims

0/8
  1. J1

    Criteria for reading results: cut-off values, thresholds, positive / negative / indeterminate (invalid) decision points; whether confirmatory testing is needed

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU results section vs PER

  2. J2

    Mathematical approach / calculation for quantitative results described

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU calculation section

  3. J3

    Biological reference intervals for defined populations stated where relevant

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Reference interval study

  4. J4

    Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation stated

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Annex XIII Part A · Evidence: Analytical performance report

  5. J5

    Analytical specificity, cross-reactivity and endogenous / exogenous interferents (haemolysis, icterus, lipaemia, common drugs) stated

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Annex XIII Part A · Evidence: Interference / cross-reactivity study

  6. J6

    Measuring interval and linearity stated

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Annex XIII Part A · Evidence: Linearity study

  7. J7

    Precision stated: repeatability (within-run) and reproducibility (between-day / lot / site / operator); trueness and accuracy where relevant

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Annex XIII Part A · Evidence: Precision study

  8. J8

    Clinical performance: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, PPV and NPV where relevant, consistent with the CPR

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Annex XIII · MDCG 2022-2 · Evidence: Clinical performance report vs IFU

K. IFU: limitations, warnings and regulatory notices

0/6
  1. K1

    Procedural limitations stated: interfering substances (HIL), hook / prozone effect limits, false-positive and false-negative scenarios, specimen limitations and populations in which the assay is not validated

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU limitations section vs risk file

  2. K2

    Warnings and precautions: signs of malfunction or degradation, external influences, infectious or hazardous materials, sensitising substances; special facilities or training where relevant

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Risk file vs IFU warnings section

  3. K3

    Safe handling, biological decontamination and waste disposal (biohazard waste, sharps, CLP-classified chemicals; infection, environmental and physical hazards)

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU disposal section

  4. K4

    Class C and D: IFU references the location of, and link to, the Summary of Safety and Performance on EUDAMED

    Art. 29 · MDCG 2022-9 · Evidence: IFU text vs SSP

  5. K5

    Serious-incident reporting notice to the manufacturer and the Competent Authority

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Art. 82 · Evidence: IFU regulatory notice

  6. K6

    IFU date of issue / revision date and version number, with modifications clearly indicated; manufacturer contact for technical assistance

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: IFU footer / revision history

L. Instruments, analysers and software

0/15
  1. L1

    Intended platform role, compatible assays and automated steps performed (e.g. extraction, amplification, detection)

    Annex I §20.4.1(c), (i) · Evidence: Instrument IFU vs assay menu / compatibility list

  2. L2

    Measurement principle described: optical detection system, thermal cycling, fluidics path, sensor mechanics

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 18113-3 / -5 · Evidence: Instrument IFU vs design description

  3. L3

    Instrument performance stated: precision across runs / wells / positions, carry-over limits, photometric / fluorescence linearity

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 18113-3 / -5 · Evidence: Instrument V&V reports vs IFU

  4. L4

    Clinical performance cross-referenced to the assay-specific IFUs / application sheets

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Instrument IFU cross-references

  5. L5

    Sample handling: rack types, dead-volume requirements, accepted tube types and dimension tolerances

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Instrument IFU vs V&V data

  6. L6

    Electrical safety and EMC disclosures: ratings, voltage, frequency, power consumption, fuse ratings; declarations aligned with EN IEC 61010-1, EN IEC 61010-2-101 and EN IEC 61326-2-6

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN IEC 61010-1 / -2-101 · EN IEC 61326-2-6 · Evidence: Instrument manual + rating plate vs safety / EMC test reports

  7. L7

    Ambient operating limits: temperature, humidity, altitude and ambient light

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN IEC 61010-1 · Evidence: Instrument IFU vs environmental test data

  8. L8

    Installation verification and readiness checks described

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Installation / IQ instructions

  9. L9

    Interoperability: compatible LIS protocols (e.g. HL7, ASTM / CLSI LIS2), middleware specification, minimum hardware, operating system and IT network requirements

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: System specification + interface documentation

  10. L10

    Data security / cybersecurity measures, including protection against unauthorised access

    Annex I §20.4.1 · MDCG 2019-16 · Evidence: Cybersecurity file

  11. L11

    Consumables and reagent compatibility: qualified reagents, wash solutions, cuvettes and calibration consumables required for valid results clearly specified

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Compatibility list vs V&V data

  12. L12

    Calibration: protocol and frequency, factory calibration standards, optical / performance verification tools and start-up self-test diagnostics

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN ISO 17511 · Evidence: User manual calibration section + factory calibration records

  13. L13

    Maintenance: daily / periodic intervals, user-serviceable vs manufacturer-serviceable parts, consumable replacement

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: Service / user manual

  14. L14

    Cleaning and decontamination procedures, including decontamination before service, and biohazard spill management

    Annex I §20.4.1 · EN IEC 61010-2-101 · Evidence: User manual cleaning / decontamination section

  15. L15

    Error / fault messages and diagnostic codes listed with corrective actions

    Annex I §20.4.1 · Evidence: User manual troubleshooting section

M. Self-testing and near-patient testing (Annex I §19, §20.4.2)

0/8
  1. M1

    Label and IFU legible and understandable for the intended user, confirmed by usability testing

    Annex I §19 · IEC 62366-1 · Evidence: Usability engineering file + summative report

  2. M2

    Illustrated step-by-step instructions in simple, non-clinical language: reagent preparation, specimen collection, running the test, reading the result

    Annex I §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU procedure section + usability data

  3. M3

    Visual guide (photos / drawings) for positive, negative and invalid results; results presented so they are readily understood

    Annex I §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU results section

  4. M4

    Advice on action for positive, negative and indeterminate results; test limitations; possibility of false positive / false negative; factors that may affect the result

    Annex I §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU interpretation section

  5. M5

    Self-testing: prominent statement not to take any medical decision or adjust medication without consulting a healthcare professional; information on the disease, its prevalence and national advice sources where available

    Annex I §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU text

  6. M6

    Self-testing for monitoring a diagnosed condition: patient adapts treatment only after appropriate training

    Annex I §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU text

  7. M7

    Self-testing: instructions for safe disposal of used and contaminated components at home (lancets, swabs, cassettes, buffer)

    Annex I §20.4.1 · §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU disposal section

  8. M8

    Near-patient testing: prominent, fast-action warnings and internal / external QC routines suitable for non-laboratory clinical staff (nurses, clinic staff)

    Annex I §19 · §20.4.1 · §20.4.2 · Evidence: IFU warnings and QC section + usability data

O. Consistency with TD, risk, performance evaluation and PMS

0/6
  1. O1

    Each warning, precaution, limitation and contra-indication traces to a risk control or residual risk in the risk file

    EN ISO 14971 · Annex II §5 · Evidence: Labelling-to-risk traceability matrix

  2. O2

    Claims in label / IFU supported by the PER (scientific validity, analytical and clinical performance)

    Art. 56 · Annex XIII · Evidence: PER vs IFU claims

  3. O3

    Class C and D: Summary of Safety and Performance consistent with the IFU and written for the intended user (and patient where relevant)

    Art. 29 · Evidence: SSP vs IFU

  4. O4

    Label and IFU consistent with the DoC, EUDAMED data and marketing material; no misleading claims

    Art. 7 · Art. 17 · Evidence: Cross-document consistency check

  5. O5

    PMS, PMPF, vigilance and FSCA outputs reviewed for labelling impact; label / IFU changes under change control

    Art. 78–81 · Annex III · Evidence: PMS plan / PSUR + labelling change records

  6. O6

    Class C and D self-testing: SSP includes a dedicated summary written in language a lay person can understand

    Art. 29 · MDCG 2022-9 · Evidence: SSP lay-person section

P. Reference control and QC sign-off

0/6
  1. P1

    Legal IVDR requirements, harmonised standards, common specifications, non-binding guidance and internal I3CGLOBAL QC criteria kept separate

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Reference register

  2. P2

    Not every standard or guidance applied to every device: applicability and exclusion rationale recorded

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Reference register / applicability notes

  3. P3

    Controlled reference register shows title, identifier, edition, publication date, applicability, harmonisation status, link and date last checked

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Reference register

  4. P4

    Current IVDR harmonised standards list, common specifications and latest MDCG revisions verified on the Commission website before final approval

    MDCG register · OJEU · Evidence: Dated verification record

  5. P5

    Each deficiency logged with corrective action, owner, target date and close-out sign-off

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Deficiency and corrective action log

  6. P6

    Final review signed by QA reviewer, RA specialist, usability / systems engineer and performance evaluation expert

    I3CGLOBAL control · Evidence: Signed QC approval record

3. QC report

Not started

Progress is saved in this browser only.