Quick Contact
Just supply the infomation requested by us. We develop your Technical Documentation for you

Class III Medical Devices
This page provides an overview of Class III medical devices under the European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) 2017/745. It outlines the definition of Class III devices, the stringent requirements they face, and the conformity assessment procedures necessary for placing them on the EU market. This information is crucial for manufacturers seeking to understand and comply with the regulatory landscape for high-risk medical devices in Europe.
What are Class III Medical Devices?
Class III medical devices are the highest risk category of medical devices under the EU MDR 2017/745. These devices pose the greatest potential risk to the patient and/or user. They typically sustain or support life, are implanted in the body, or control critical bodily functions. Due to their high-risk nature, Class III devices are subject to the most rigorous regulatory scrutiny. A few examples of Class III medical devices include:
-
Implantable devices (e.g., pacemakers, defibrillators, hip replacements, breast implants)
-
Heart valves
-
Stents
-
Neural stimulators
-
Total joint replacements
Do you need an email containing full details within 2 minutes?
Key Requirements for Class III Medical Devices under EU MDR
The EU MDR imposes several stringent requirements on manufacturers of Class III medical devices. These requirements are designed to ensure the safety and performance of these high-risk devices. Some of the key requirements include:
- Technical Documentation: Manufacturers must prepare comprehensive technical documentation for their Class III devices. This documentation must demonstrate that the device meets the relevant General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs) outlined in Annex I of the EU MDR.
-
Clinical Evaluation: A thorough clinical evaluation is essential for Class III devices. Manufacturers must conduct clinical investigations to gather sufficient clinical evidence to demonstrate the safety and performance of their devices for their intended purpose. The clinical evaluation must be based on a critical evaluation of relevant scientific literature, clinical experience, and clinical investigation results.
-
Quality Management System (QMS): Manufacturers must establish and maintain a robust QMS that complies with the requirements of ISO 13485. The QMS should cover all aspects of the device lifecycle, from design and development to manufacturing, distribution, and post-market surveillance.
-
Unique Device Identification (UDI): The EU MDR mandates the use of a UDI system for medical devices. Manufacturers must assign a UDI to their Class III devices and submit the UDI information to the European Database on Medical Devices (EUDAMED). The UDI system facilitates traceability and post-market surveillance.
-
Post-Market Surveillance (PMS): Manufacturers are required to implement a comprehensive PMS system to actively monitor the performance of their devices after they are placed on the market.
-
Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC): Manufacturers must designate a PRRC who is responsible for ensuring that the device complies with the requirements of the EU MDR.
Conformity Assessment Procedures for Class III Medical Devices
Class III devices are subject to a rigorous conformity assessment procedure that involves a Notified Body. The Notified Body is an independent organization designated by a Member State to assess the conformity of medical devices with the requirements of the EU MDR. The conformity assessment procedure for Class III devices typically involves the following steps as shown in the below image

Class III medical devices face the highest level of regulatory scrutiny under EU MDR 2017/745, where delays, non-compliance, and weak clinical strategies can cost manufacturers millions in lost opportunity. Navigating this complexity demands not just regulatory knowledge, but a strategic partner with proven execution capability. I3CGlobal empowers manufacturers to win in this demanding environment by delivering end-to-end MDR solutions from regulatory strategy and conformity assessment support to clinical evidence generation and post-market surveillance. With I3CGlobal, manufacturers accelerate EU market entry, reduce regulatory risk, and gain a competitive edge, ensuring their high-risk, high-value innovations reach patients faster and with confidence.
Class III Medical Device Challenges
Navigating the regulatory landscape for Class III medical devices under the EU MDR can be challenging. Manufacturers need to:
-
Allocate sufficient resources to ensure compliance.
-
Develop a robust QMS.
-
Conduct thorough clinical evaluations.
-
Establish a comprehensive PMS system.
-
Stay up-to-date with the latest regulatory requirements.
-
Choose a Notified Body carefully.
Class III Medical Device Consultants
For Class III medical devices, regulatory success under EU MDR demands seasoned experts with proven experience in high-risk device compliance and clinical evaluation. I3CGLOBAL brings specialized Class III expertise to guide manufacturers through the most complex regulatory challenges, ensuring faster approvals, reduced risk, and sustained EU market access.
- Technical Documentation guidance & preparation
- Notified Body submission and answering to the review comments
- Guides in Biological Evaluation
- Review the external protocols and reports
- Prepares Clinical Evaluation Report as per Meddev 2.7/1 Rev 4
- Conducts Risk Analysis and prepares Risk Management File as per EN ISO 14971
- Arrange Notified Body and coordinate with them till the issue of the CE Certificate
- Arranges EU Representative from the European Union
- Arrange a Free Sale Certificate from the European Union
- Develops Post Market Surveillance plan, Post Market Clinical follow-up plan and report and Periodic Safety Update Report.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Clinical investigations and equivalence shall be performed for Class III Medical Device CE Marking?
A. If equivalent devices have sufficient clinical data and the manufacturer conducted PMCF studies
- Certain design modifications of the manufacturer’s device
- Equivalent devices marketed by other manufacturers, where the contract allows ongoing access to data
- Existing CE-marked devices
B. If the devices have sufficient clinical data compliant with CS if available
- Sutures, staples, dental fillings, dental braces, tooth crowns, screws, wedges, plates, wires, pins, clips or connectors
What are the devices covered in the new device reclassifications as per Annex VIII?
- Implantable contraceptives
- Absorbable non-implants (eg skin or GI)
- Total and partial joint replacement implants
- Implants in contact with the spinal column
- Devices incorporating nanomaterials
- Non-invasive devices used in direct contact with human cells for IVF
- Devices incorporating human-derived substances
- Software that could have an impact that may cause death or irreversible deterioration of a person’s state of health
